Validating execution
Talks that move

Validating execution against design (as-built monitoring)

Improving quality control and compliance by comparing design and execution through scalable, data-driven satellite monitoring
Schedule a meeting
Ensuring construction aligns with design is complex in large-scale projects, with reliance on manual inspections limiting visibility and control
WHY THIS “VALIDATING CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DESIGN” CHALLENGE?
From manual verification to objective validation at scale

Traditional validation methods lack consistency and scalability, increasing the risk of undetected deviations, rework, and compliance issues

Key benefits
Why construction validation falls short

The limits of manual oversight

check icon
Limited visibility across large projects

Manual inspections cannot provide continuous and comprehensive coverage

check icon
Delayed detection of deviations

Discrepancies between design and execution are often identified too late

check icon
High reliance on on-site inspections

Physical validation increases cost and slows certification processes

check icon
Risk of rework and compliance issues

Undetected deviations lead to quality problems and additional costs

How NTT DATA helps

01
Compare design vs. execution at scale

Use satellite imagery to validate infrastructure deployment against planned layouts

Satellite Natural Resources
02
Monitor construction progress continuously

Track how assets evolve over time using multi-temporal data

Design-to-execution comparison
03
Detect discrepancies early

Identify deviations before they escalate into costly rework

Multi-Temporal Data
04
Support validation and certification processes

Provide objective evidence to strengthen contractor control and Compliance

Validation platforms
05
Reduce dependency on field inspections

Enable scalable monitoring across multiple projects without logistical complexity

Hybrid inspection models
Improved quality
Proven impact
Improving construction quality through objective validation
Results that matter
Improving construction quality through objective validation
check icon
25–40% reduction in rework

Early detection of deviations minimizes costly corrections

check icon
20–30% improvement in validation efficiency

Automated monitoring accelerates certification and control processes

check icon
Enhanced contractor control

Objective evidence strengthens oversight of EPC execution and claims

check icon
Improved compliance and quality assurance

Continuous validation ensures alignment with project specifications.

Strengthen Construction Control Across Projects and Sites

Improve quality and execution consistency

Drag