
Protection and automation functions are becoming increasingly dependent on network behaviour, where a delay acceptable for enterprise traffic may be unacceptable for a protection command or fast control sequence. Utilities therefore need communications architectures that distinguish workloads by timing and criticality, allowing suitable OT services to converge on shared infrastructure without sacrificing the performance required for safe and reliable operation.
Deterministic treatment gives critical applications predictable communications while allowing utilities to modernise and consolidate network infrastructure more selectively.
Tightly controlled latency and jitter help protection and control applications receive critical messages within more predictable performance boundaries.
Critical OT services can coexist with monitoring, video and other traffic while maintaining the differentiated treatment required by each application.
Consolidating suitable workloads onto modern Ethernet and IP infrastructure can decrease dependence on specialised point-to-point communication technologies.
Clearer visibility into network performance helps teams understand whether latency, jitter and path behaviour continue to meet application-specific operational requirements.
How NTT DATA helps
NTT DATA assesses latency, jitter, availability, bandwidth and criticality requirements before determining how each OT traffic class should be handled.

Traffic shaping, scheduling, prioritisation and redundant paths are designed to give critical messages predictable treatment under varying network conditions.

Time Sensitive Networking and Precision Time Protocol support reserved transmission opportunities and accurate time coordination across relevant OT environments.

Quality of Service and traffic engineering separate protection, control, monitoring, video and corporate traffic according to defined operational policies.

Network monitoring measures latency, jitter, packet loss and path performance against required thresholds so deterministic behaviour can be validated throughout operation.


Performance targets are indicative, with outcomes shaped by network architecture, operating model, asset criticality, integration scope and deployment maturity.
50% to 90% reduction. Predictable traffic handling can make delivery timing more stable for protection and control workloads whose performance depends on tightly bounded network behaviour.
50% to 90% reduction. Scheduling, prioritisation and synchronisation can limit timing fluctuation across deterministic services, supporting applications that require messages to arrive within narrow timing windows.
20% to 50% reduction. Converging suitable services onto modern Ethernet and IP infrastructure can reduce the need to maintain separate generations of specialised communication equipment.
20% to 40% reduction. Continuous visibility into latency, jitter, packet loss and path performance can help engineers isolate network issues faster and relate them to application requirements.
Apply deterministic mechanisms only where workloads have clearly defined timing requirements, then validate performance continuously to protect resilience while modernising utility communications.